On 06/14/2017 10:42 PM, David Miller wrote: > Please always provide a proper "[PATCH 0/N ...] " header posting > explaining what the patch series is doing, how it is doing it, and why > it is doing it that way. > > I am getting kind of tired asking people for this FWIW... > Sorry, I will send a v2 with a proper header patch shortly. Thanks for the prompt feedback.
- [PATCH 1/5 net-next] ibmvnic: Activate disabled RX buffer po... Thomas Falcon
- [PATCH 4/5 net-next] ibmvnic: Remove VNIC_CLOSING check... Thomas Falcon
- [PATCH 2/5 net-next] ibmvnic: Ensure that TX queues are... Thomas Falcon
- [PATCH 3/5 net-next] ibmvnic: Sanitize entire SCRQ buff... Thomas Falcon
- [PATCH 5/5 net-next] ibmvnic: Exit polling routine corr... Thomas Falcon
- Re: [PATCH 1/5 net-next] ibmvnic: Activate disabled RX ... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH 1/5 net-next] ibmvnic: Activate disabled... Thomas Falcon
