From: Hugo Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:45:28 +0100
> Is it reasonable to consider that control packet processing needs to > be serialized with data packet processing? In this particular case, is > it not the tests that are broken if not giving enough time to the host > to configure the address? The standards do not specify implementation > details so no specific processing model should be assumed, and what you > describe sounds a bit like an ideal model. Just like a TCP connection, packets cause state transitions. And it is reasonable to expect that after a state transition, the effects can be visible by subsequent packets. I think the tests are doing valid things. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
