On Mon, 29 May 2017 11:37:22 -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote: > This code is also hit via the OVS path, and i don't see a problem with > your changes and analysis but i am not too familiar with the ovs call > path. I see that the relevant developers are CC'ed.
I don't see a problem with ovs and this patch. Ovs calls rtnl_delete_link. I'd prefer to have the code in a vxlan_vs_del_dev function to be symmetrical with vxlan_vs_add_dev similarly to what Roopa suggested. If you keep me in CC while resending I'll be happy to add my ack to the patch. Thanks! Jiri
