On 六, 2017-05-27 at 02:25 +0900, 吉藤英明 wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-05-26 22:55 GMT+09:00 yuan linyu <cug...@163.com>: > > > > On 五, 2017-05-26 at 22:45 +0900, 吉藤英明 wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > 2017-05-26 22:23 GMT+09:00 yuan linyu <cug...@163.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > From: yuan linyu <linyu.y...@alcatel-sbell.com.cn> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <linyu.y...@alcatel-sbell.com.cn> > > > > --- > > > > net/ipv6/ndisc.c | 109 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > > > Sorry, I don't think this kind of change for style is good > > > bacause this makes effort of backport more difficult. > > hi, i can't understand. > > if any change of this code you decide to backport, it need effort, > > not only important fix. > > > > do I miss your point ? > Please let us minimize our effort when doing so. > > If the style is not changed, we have more chance to apply the patch > itself on top of old tree. > > Thank you. I don't know you hate this kind of changes, from a code reader view, I like to see code with good style. I am not happy when reading code with this kind of bad style.
And it only spend a command time to backport, right? it will never spend your effort only if this code will not change in future. > > > > > > > > > > > > --yoshfuji > > > > >
