On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:17:25 +0400 Alexey Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello! > > > Wouldn't it be better to have a consistent interface (skb always freed), > > and clone the skb if needed for deferred processing? > > I think you mean this. > > Note, it is real skb_clone(), not alloc_skb(). Equeued skb contains > the whole half-prepared netlink message plus room for the rest. > It could be also skb_copy(), if we want to be puristic about mangling > cloned data, but original copy is really not going to be used. > > Alexey > That is what I was thinking of. Doesn't matter copy or clone, I prefer clone. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
