On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Shubham Bansal <illusionist....@gmail.com> wrote: > Finally finished testing. > > "test_bpf: Summary: 314 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [274/306 JIT'ed]"
Nice work! Glad you've been chipping away at this. Thanks! -Kees > > Will send the patch after code refactoring. Thanks for all the help > you guys. I really really appreciate it. > > Special thanks to Kees and Daniel. :) > > Best, > Shubham Bansal > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Shubham Bansal >> <illusionist....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> What do you guys suggest i should implement it? I am almost done with >>> my current implementation but if you think I should change it to the >>> way David suggested, its better to suggest now before I send the >>> patch. >> >> I'd say send what you have right now, as it's a good starting point >> for future work. I'll be curious to see the benchmarks, etc. It can be >> a base for further optimization. >> >> Thanks for chipping away at this! >> >> -Kees >> >> -- >> Kees Cook >> Pixel Security -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
