On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Joao Pinto <joao.pi...@synopsys.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am making tests with a Mellanox MLX5 Endpoint, and I am getting kernel hangs
> when trying to enable the hca:
>
> mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0: Warning: couldn't set 64-bit PCI DMA mask
> mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0: Warning: couldn't set 64-bit consistent PCI DMA mask
> mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0: firmware version: 16.19.21102
> INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 10 seconds.
>       Not tainted 4.11.0-BETAMSIX1 #51
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> swapper         D    0     1      0 0x00000000
>
> Stack Trace:
>   __switch_to+0x0/0x94
>   __schedule+0x1da/0x8b0
>   schedule+0x26/0x6c
>   schedule_timeout+0x2da/0x380
>   wait_for_completion+0x92/0x104
>   mlx5_cmd_exec+0x70e/0xd60
>   mlx5_load_one+0x1b4/0xad8
>   init_one+0x404/0x600
>   pci_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0
>   really_probe+0x1ac/0x348
>   __driver_attach+0xa8/0xd0
>   bus_for_each_dev+0x3c/0x74
>   bus_add_driver+0xc2/0x184
>   driver_register+0x50/0xec
>   init+0x40/0x60
>
> (...)
>
> Stack Trace:
>   __switch_to+0x0/0x94
>   __schedule+0x1da/0x8b0
>   schedule+0x26/0x6c
>   schedule_timeout+0x2da/0x380
>   wait_for_completion+0x92/0x104
>   mlx5_cmd_exec+0x70e/0xd60
>   mlx5_load_one+0x1b4/0xad8
>   init_one+0x404/0x600
>   pci_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0
>   really_probe+0x1ac/0x348
>   __driver_attach+0xa8/0xd0
>   bus_for_each_dev+0x3c/0x74
>   bus_add_driver+0xc2/0x184
>   driver_register+0x50/0xec
>   init+0x40/0x60
> mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0: wait_func:882:(pid 1): ENABLE_HCA(0x104) timeout. Will
> cause a leak of a command resource
> mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0: enable hca failed
> mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0: mlx5_load_one failed with error code -110
> mlx5_core: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -110
>
> Could you give me a clue of what might be happennig?
>

Hi Joao,

Looks like FW is not responding, most likely due to the DMA mask
setting warnings, which architecture is this ?

> Thanks,
> Joao

Reply via email to