On 17-04-28 09:11 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:52:56AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 17-04-28 08:00 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi,
this series is intended to avoid false-positives which match
truncated packets against flower classifiers which match on:
* zero L4 ports or;
How would you describe such a rule? The case that is being dealt with is
one where there is a parse error and thus nothing to match on from a flower
pov.
A default lower prio match all on udp or icmp?
Example what would offloading of
header_parse_err_action mean?
Why would it need to differ semantically to the implementation in this
patch? I feel that I am missing something.
Unless I misunderstood:
Isnt the issue the dissector that confused something missing L4 ports
and said "port is zero"?
Unless the hardware has the same "bug" as the dissector seems like would
be a different semantic in the h/ware.
cheers,
jamal
