2017-04-27, 11:21:51 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> However, perhaps there's the chance that fraglist skbs having
> separate fraglists are actually forbidden? Is this the case?

Hmm, I think this can actually happen:

    /*  net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c  */
    static int ip_frag_reasm(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *prev,
                         struct net_device *dev)
    {
    
    ...
    
        /* If the first fragment is fragmented itself, we split
         * it to two chunks: the first with data and paged part
         * and the second, holding only fragments. */
        if (skb_has_frag_list(head)) {
                struct sk_buff *clone;
                int i, plen = 0;
    
                clone = alloc_skb(0, GFP_ATOMIC);
                if (!clone)
                        goto out_nomem;
                clone->next = head->next;
                head->next = clone;
                skb_shinfo(clone)->frag_list = skb_shinfo(head)->frag_list;
                skb_frag_list_init(head);
                for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(head)->nr_frags; i++)
                        plen += skb_frag_size(&skb_shinfo(head)->frags[i]);
                clone->len = clone->data_len = head->data_len - plen;
                head->data_len -= clone->len;
                head->len -= clone->len;
                clone->csum = 0;
                clone->ip_summed = head->ip_summed;
                add_frag_mem_limit(qp->q.net, clone->truesize);
        }
    
    ...
    }
    

You can test that with a vxlan tunnel on top of a vxlan tunnel ("real"
MTU is 1500, first tunnel MTU set to 10000, second tunnel MTU set to
40000 -- or anything, as long as they both get fragmented).

-- 
Sabrina

Reply via email to