From: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:17:49 +0200
> I'd have less of an issue with this if we'd be talking about > something computationally expensive, but this is about storing > an extra value inside a struct just to avoid one "shr" in insert path... Agreed, this shift is probably filling an available cpu cycle :-)
