On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 03:14:21PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> > > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100 > > > >> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard > >> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__, > >> and *that* isn't right either. > > > > Yep, that's something that needs correcting. > > > Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__
Absolutely not. Rich
