Michael Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Is there really a point to having michael_mic in crypto api? The only users 
> are 802.11 stacks. I can imagine arc4 being used for other purposes, but 
> michael_mic is very much wireless only. The only advantage of keeping 
> michael_mic in crypto seems to be the testing code.

I suppose the question is that what do you gain by moving it out?
If all else being equal then it's better to have a standardised
interface for accessing it.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to