On Sat, 2017-04-08 at 11:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> } else {
> - for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid <= NUM_STA; pstat->aid++)
> + for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid < NUM_STA; pstat->aid++)
> if (pstapriv->sta_aid[pstat->aid - 1] == NULL)
> break;why not start at 0 and increment pstat->aid afterwards? Meh.
