On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 03:57:31AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > >> down_write(&listeners->sem);
> > >> list_for_each_entry_safe(s, tmp, &listeners->list, list) {
> > >> - ret = genlmsg_unicast(skb, s->pid);
> > >> + skb_next = NULL;
> > >> + if (!list_islast(&s->list, &listeners->list)) {
> > >> + skb_next = skb_clone(skb_cur, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > If we do a GFP_KERNEL allocation with this semaphore held, and the
> > > oom-killer tries to kill something to satisfy the allocation, and the
> > > killed task gets stuck on that semaphore, I wonder of the box locks up.
> >
> > We do GFP_KERNEL inside semaphores/mutexes in lots of places. So if this
> > can deadlock with the oom-killer we probably should fix that, preferably
> > by having GFP_KERNEL fail in that case.
>
> This lock is special, in that it's taken on the exit() path (I think). So
> it can block tasks which are trying to exit.
Sorry, missed the context.
If there is a deadlock then it's not just this allocation that you
need worry about. There is also an allocation within genlmsg_uniast
that would be GFP_KERNEL.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
