On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 06:38:39PM -0700, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com>
> 
> Earlier patch c4adfc822bf5 ("bonding: make speed, duplex setting
> consistent with link state") made an attempt to keep slave state
> consistent with speed and duplex settings. Unfortunately link-state
> transition is used to change the active link especially when used
> in conjunction with mii-mon. The above mentioned patch broke that
> logic. Also when speed and duplex settings for a link are updated
> during a link-event, the link-status should not be changed to
> invoke correct transition logic.
> 
> This patch fixes this issue by moving the link-state update outside
> of the bond_update_speed_duplex() fn and to the places where this fn
> is called and update link-state selectively.
> 
> Fixes: c4adfc822bf5 ("bonding: make speed, duplex setting consistent
> with link state")
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <a...@greyhouse.net>

> ---
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 27359dab78a1..535388b15cde 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -378,20 +378,15 @@ static int bond_update_speed_duplex(struct slave *slave)
>       slave->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
>  
>       res = __ethtool_get_link_ksettings(slave_dev, &ecmd);
> -     if (res < 0) {
> -             slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
> +     if (res < 0)
>               return 1;
> -     }
> -     if (ecmd.base.speed == 0 || ecmd.base.speed == ((__u32)-1)) {
> -             slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
> +     if (ecmd.base.speed == 0 || ecmd.base.speed == ((__u32)-1))
>               return 1;
> -     }
>       switch (ecmd.base.duplex) {
>       case DUPLEX_FULL:
>       case DUPLEX_HALF:
>               break;
>       default:
> -             slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
>               return 1;
>       }
>  
> @@ -1563,7 +1558,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct 
> net_device *slave_dev)
>       new_slave->delay = 0;
>       new_slave->link_failure_count = 0;
>  
> -     bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
> +     if (bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave))
> +             new_slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
>  
>       new_slave->last_rx = jiffies -
>               (msecs_to_jiffies(bond->params.arp_interval) + 1);
> @@ -2126,6 +2122,7 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
>  
>               case BOND_LINK_UP:
>                       if (bond_update_speed_duplex(slave)) {
> +                             slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
>                               netdev_warn(bond->dev,
>                                           "failed to get link speed/duplex 
> for %s\n",
>                                           slave->dev->name);
> -- 
> 2.12.2.715.g7642488e1d-goog
> 

Reply via email to