On Tuesday, 11 July 2006 03:57 pm, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > You have a typo in the code commented below.
D'oh!!! That one completely slipped by me - thanks! I'll resend this patch =) > I have a question regarsing your netchannel design - as far as I can > see, you steal data in interrupts and then convert it into skb and run > through usual netif_receive_skb(). Thus you dedicate one thread (one > CPU) to do the whole processing for all sockets which do not have > netchannels bound to them. Did you benchmarked such approach both with > and without netchannel bound to the socket? No benchmarking as of yet... Have been a bit busy of late with something else, but getting back into this V shortly and will hopefully have a whole lot more info for you soon. Cheers, K - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
