On 2017-03-30 12:18, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 11:55 +0900, Seiichi Ikarashi wrote:
> 
>> I got a report that receiving a RST packet but poll() got only POLLERR, no 
>> POLLIN|POLLRDHUP .
>> It was an old x86_64 kernel which does not include sk_state_{load,store} 
>> functions.
>> I suspected some race might have occur above.
> 
> It looks that a one-liner patch would be enough in tcp_done()
> 
> No need adding extra barriers

I agree.
sk->sk_shutdown seems not affect the behavior of both tcp_clear_xmit_timers()
and reqsk_fastopen_remove().

> 
> Untested patch :

Sorry, I cannot test it because I do not have a replication environment.

> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 
> 1e319a525d51b0b603a5ccc5143381c752b9f2c7..4107d3fc00a53f768cdb885971a1067c810f5c9f
>  100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -3285,12 +3285,12 @@ void tcp_done(struct sock *sk)
>       if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT || sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
>               TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
>  
> +     sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
>       tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
>       tcp_clear_xmit_timers(sk);
>       if (req)
>               reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
>  
> -     sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
>  
>       if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
>               sk->sk_state_change(sk);
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to