On 27/03/2017 21:02, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 02:50:47PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:03:51 +0200, Gal Pressman wrote: >>> This ethtool patch adds support to set and get the current RSS hash >>> function for the device through the new hfunc mask field in the >>> ethtool_rxfh struct. Kernel supported hash function names are queried >>> with ETHTOOL_GSTRINGS - each string is corresponding with a bit in hfunc >>> mask according to its index in the string-set. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eyal Perry <eya...@mellanox.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <g...@mellanox.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com> >> Hi John, >> >> It seems you have applied both my earlier patch with get support and >> this: >> >> adbaa18b9bc1 ("ethtool: Support for configurable RSS hash function") >> b932835d2302 ("ethtool: print hash function with ethtool >> -x|--show-rxfh-indir") >> >> Now we print the RSS function twice: >> >> RX flow hash indirection table for em4 with 4 RX ring(s): >> 0: [...] >> RSS hash function: toeplitz <--- from my adbaa18b9bc1 >> RSS hash key: >> Operation not supported >> RSS hash function: <--- from this patch >> toeplitz: on >> xor: off >> crc32: off >> >> Reverting my patch is probably the easiest way forward, although I find >> it more concise and easier to parse in test scripts :) > Thanks for pointing-out this issue! I apologize for my own confusion. > > As you suggest, I will be reverting your patch. > > Thanks, > > John 126464e4da18 ('Revert "ethtool: Support for configurable RSS hash function"')
Seems like you ended up reverting my patch instead of Jakub's? We lost the set hfunc functionality.