Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:22:22AM CET, ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote: >Hi Jiri, > >On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 08:56:26AM CET, ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote: >>>On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List >>><linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org> wrote: >>>> Web: >>>> https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/44091d29f2075972aede47ef17e1e70db3d51190 >>>> Commit: 44091d29f2075972aede47ef17e1e70db3d51190 >>>> Parent: b862815c3ee7b49ec20a9ab25da55a5f0bcbb95e >>>> Refname: refs/heads/master >>>> Author: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> >>>> AuthorDate: Fri Feb 3 10:29:06 2017 +0100 >>>> Committer: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> >>>> CommitDate: Fri Feb 3 16:35:42 2017 -0500 >>>> >>>> lib: Introduce priority array area manager >>>> >>>> This introduces a infrastructure for management of linear priority >>>> areas. Priority order in an array matters, however order of items >>>> inside >>>> a priority group does not matter. >>>> >>>> As an initial implementation, L-sort algorithm is used. It is quite >>>> trivial. More advanced algorithm called P-sort will be introduced as a >>>> follow-up. The infrastructure is prepared for other algos. >>>> >>>> Alongside this, a testing module is introduced as well. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> >>> >>>> --- a/lib/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig >>>> @@ -550,4 +550,7 @@ config STACKDEPOT >>>> config SBITMAP >>>> bool >>>> >>>> +config PARMAN >>>> + tristate "parman" >>> >>>| parman (PARMAN) [N/m/y] (NEW) ? >>>| >>>| There is no help available for this option. >>> >>>Can you please add a description for this option? >>>Or drop the "parman" string if this is always selected by its kernel users, >>>and >>>never intended to be enabled by the end user. >> >> I did it in the same way other similar lib dependencies do that. Does >> not make sense to have separate description for this, cause this is >> always only a dependency of a kernel user. > >OK, so the user should not be asked about it... > >> You suggeste to 'drop the "parman" string'. What do you mean by that >> exactly? > >... and > >- tristate "parman" >+ tristate > >should do the trick.
Okay. I will push this through the net tree. Thanks!
