Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:23:13PM CET, mahe...@google.com wrote: >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:08:16AM CET, mah...@bandewar.net wrote: >>>From: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> >>> >>>Few cleanup patches that I have accumulated over some time now. >>> >>>(a) First two patches are basically to move the work-queue initialization >>> from every ndo_open / bond_open operation to once at the beginning while >>> port creation. Work-queue initialization is an unnecessary operation >>> for every 'ifup' operation. However we have some mode-specific >>> work-queues >>> and mode can change anytime after port creation. So the second patch is >>> to ensure the correct work-handler is called based on the mode. >>> >>>(b) Third patch is simple and straightforward that removes hard-coded value >>> that was added into the initial commit and replaces it with the default >>> value configured. >>> >>>(c) The final patch in the series removes the unimplemented "port-moved" >>>state >>> from the LACP state machine. This state is defined but never set so >>> removing from the state machine logic makes code little cleaner. >>> >>>Note: None of these patches are making any functional changes. >>> >>>Mahesh Bandewar (4): >> >> Mahesh. I understand that you are still using bonding. What's stopping >> you from using team instead? >> >Let me just say this, if it was trivial enough, we'd have done with it >by now. :)
What exactly is the blocker? Can I help?
