On 02/20/2017 05:37 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 19/02/2017 at 16:37:50 +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >> Fortunately I was contacted by Bosch this Friday as they want to contribute >> a driver upgrade to support IP cores up to 3.2.x. >> Additionally their plan is to use Device Tree information to determine the >> IP core revision - or at least to cross check its information with the >> register information used in your suggestion. > > My opinion is that is is not really useful. Either we use the version > info from the register or DT. But that is probably a matter of taste and > you are the maintainer :)
I see no benefit of holding the version number in the DT, as long as the version of the HW can be auto discovered properly. >> For that reason I would suggest to wait for the driver updates from Bosch >> instead of adding an incomplete fix for only one change of eleven. > Well, having something working right now is still better that nothing. I > think it is worth having that patch now so CAN is working on our > platforms. > > Everything else can probably be built on top of it anyway. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
