From: Andreas Schultz <aschu...@tpip.net> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:04:56 +0100 (CET)
> ----- On Feb 14, 2017, at 6:48 PM, David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote: > >> From: Andreas Schultz <aschu...@tpip.net> >> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:36:18 +0100 >> >>> + if (gtp->sk0) { >>> + udp_sk(gtp->sk0)->encap_type = 0; >>> + rcu_assign_sk_user_data(gtp->sk0, NULL); >>> + sock_put(gtp->sk0); >>> } >> >> This does "sock_put(NULL);" because you are assigning gtp->sk0 to >> NULL before the sock_put() call. So you are leaking the socket, >> at best. > > I don't understand how this should happen. If I where to use > rcu_assign_pointer, > then yes, but rcu_assign_sk_user_data does assign to the sk_user_data member > of struct sock and not to the argument itself. You are right, I misread the assignment.