On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 13:53 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Tom Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:47:13 -0500 > > > I concede that features have been lost, but some applications benefit > > greatly from RDMA. For these applications and these customers, > > TOE folks give the same story... it's a broken record, really. > > Let us know when you can say something new about the situation. > > Under Linux we get to make better long term architectually sane > decisions, even if it is to the dismay of the backers of certain > short-sighted pieces of technology.
Would you indulge me with one final clarification? - Are you condemning RDMA over TCP as an ill-conceived technology? - Are you condemning the implementation of iWARP? - Are you condemning both? Thanks, Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
