The comment makes it look like get_tos() is used to validate something,
but it turns out the comment was about xfrm_find_bundle() which got removed
years ago.

xfrm_get_tos will return either the tos (ipv4) or 0 (ipv6).

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 19 +++++--------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 99ad1af2927f..6fffa2fac607 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1538,19 +1538,13 @@ xfrm_tmpl_resolve(struct xfrm_policy **pols, int npols, 
const struct flowi *fl,
 
 }
 
-/* Check that the bundle accepts the flow and its components are
- * still valid.
- */
-
-static inline int xfrm_get_tos(const struct flowi *fl, int family)
+static int xfrm_get_tos(const struct flowi *fl, int family)
 {
-       struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo = xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(family);
-       int tos;
-
-       if (!afinfo)
-               return -EINVAL;
+       struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo;
+       int tos = 0;
 
-       tos = afinfo->get_tos(fl);
+       afinfo = xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(family);
+       tos = afinfo ? afinfo->get_tos(fl) : 0;
 
        xfrm_policy_put_afinfo(afinfo);
 
@@ -1705,9 +1699,6 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm_bundle_create(struct 
xfrm_policy *policy,
        xfrm_flowi_addr_get(fl, &saddr, &daddr, family);
 
        tos = xfrm_get_tos(fl, family);
-       err = tos;
-       if (tos < 0)
-               goto put_states;
 
        dst_hold(dst);
 
-- 
2.10.2

Reply via email to