On 2/5/17 3:14 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
- if (unpriv && test->prog_type) - continue; + if (!test->prog_type) { + if (!unpriv) + set_admin(false); + printf("#%d/u %s ", i, test->descr); + do_test_single(test, true, &passes, &errors); + if (!unpriv) + set_admin(true); + }- printf("#%d %s ", i, test->descr); - do_test_single(test, unpriv, &passes, &errors); + if (!unpriv) { + printf("#%d/p %s ", i, test->descr); + do_test_single(test, false, &passes, &errors); + }
great idea. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org> as far as other patches.. we need to figure out how to avoid conflicts between net-next and Arnaldo's tree where Joe's patches went. Mickael, can you see some way of splitting the patch set between trees? Like above test_verfier.c improvement needs to go into net-next. The rest can go via perf
