> > +static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g2_watchdog_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + u16 reg;
> > +
> > + struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = dev_id;
> > +
> > + mv88e6xxx_g2_read(chip, GLOBAL2_WDOG_CONTROL, ®);
> > +
> > + dev_info(chip->dev, "Watchdog event: %04x", reg);
>
> Should this be 0x%04x just to illustrate the value is hexadecimal? And
Yes, the prefix would make sense.
> should this be dev_info_once()?
Since the next action is to disable the interrupt, and there is no
code path to reenable it, _once does not seem needed. And if for some
reason the kernel log is spammed with these messages, i want to
know. It means my interrupt handling code is badly broken!
Andrew