Andrey Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Eric, > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:51:26AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Andrey Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > One possible option to resolve this question is to show 2 relatively short >> > patches just introducing namespaces for sockets in 2 ways: with explicit >> > function parameters and using implicit current context. >> > Then people can compare them and vote. >> > Do you think it's worth the effort? >> >> Given that we have two strong opinions in different directions I think it >> is worth the effort to resolve this. > > Do you have time to extract necessary parts of your old patch? > Or you aren't afraid of letting me draft an alternative version of socket > namespaces basing on your code? :)
I'm not terribly afraid. I can always say you did it wrong. :) I don't think I am going to have time today. But since this conversation is slowing down and we are to getting into the technical details. I will try and find some time. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
