On 01/26/2017 12:28 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:02:19 -0600
> Thomas Falcon <tlfal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> static irqreturn_t ibmvnic_interrupt(int irq, void *instance)
>> {
>> struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter = instance;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->crq.lock, flags);
>> + vio_disable_interrupts(adapter->vdev);
>> + tasklet_schedule(&adapter->tasklet);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->crq.lock, flags);
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
> Why not use NAPI? rather than a tasklet
>
This interrupt function doesn't process packets, but message passing between
firmware and driver for determining device capabilities and available
resources, such as the number TX and RX queues.