Subject should contain "V2"
Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:52:44PM CET, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>From: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com>
>
>Introduce optional 128-bit action cookie.
>Like all other cookie schemes in the networking world (eg in protocols
>like http or existing kernel fib protocol field, etc) the idea is to save
>user state that when retrieved serves as a correlator. The kernel
>_should not_ intepret it. The user can store whatever they wish in the
>128 bits.
>
>Sample exercise(using two 64bit values to represent the 128 bits):
Looks like you did not update the description.
>
>.. create an accept action with cookie a1b2c3d4
>sudo $TC actions add action ok index 1 cookie a1b2c3d4
>
>.. dump all gact actions..
>sudo $TC -s actions ls action gact
>
> action order 0: gact action pass
> random type none pass val 0
> index 1 ref 1 bind 0 installed 5 sec used 5 sec
> Action statistics:
> Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> cookie a1b2c3d4
>
>.. bind the accept action to a filter..
>sudo $TC filter add dev lo parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 \
>u32 match ip dst 127.0.0.1/32 flowid 1:1 action gact index 1
>
>... send some traffic..
>$ ping 127.0.0.1 -c 3
>PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
>64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
>64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.027 ms
>64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms
>
>--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
>3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2109ms
>rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.020/0.028/0.038/0.008 ms 1
>
>... show some stats
>$ sudo $TC -s actions get action gact index 1
>
> action order 1: gact action pass
> random type none pass val 0
> index 1 ref 2 bind 1 installed 204 sec used 5 sec
> Action statistics:
> Sent 12168 bytes 164 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> cookie a1b2c3d4
>
>.. try longer cookie...
>$ sudo $TC actions replace action ok index 1 cookie 1234567890abcdef
>.. dump..
>$ sudo $TC -s actions ls action gact
>
> action order 1: gact action pass
> random type none pass val 0
> index 1 ref 2 bind 1 installed 204 sec used 5 sec
> Action statistics:
> Sent 12168 bytes 164 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> cookie 1234567890abcdef
>
>Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com>
V1->V2 changelog would ne nice.
>---
> include/net/act_api.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h | 11 +++++++++++
> net/sched/act_api.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h
>index 1d71644..0692458 100644
>--- a/include/net/act_api.h
>+++ b/include/net/act_api.h
>@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct tc_action {
> struct rcu_head tcfa_rcu;
> struct gnet_stats_basic_cpu __percpu *cpu_bstats;
> struct gnet_stats_queue __percpu *cpu_qstats;
>+ struct tc_cookie *act_ck;
I wonder if we just can't do:
struct tc_cookie act_ck;
You would safe kzalloc. I don't have strong opinion though..
> };
> #define tcf_head common.tcfa_head
> #define tcf_index common.tcfa_index
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
>index 1e5e1dd..063bc89 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
>@@ -4,6 +4,16 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/pkt_sched.h>
>
>+#define MAX_TC_COOKIE_SZ 16
I like to have some "namespace" prefix for user api.
"TC_COOKIE_MAX_SIZE" perhaps?
>+
>+/* This structure holds cookie structure that is passed from user
>+ * to the kernel for actions and classifiers
>+ */
>+struct tc_cookie {
>+ unsigned char ck[MAX_TC_COOKIE_SZ];
>+ unsigned char ck_len;
This struct should certainly not be in UAPI header.
>+};
>+
> /* Action attributes */
> enum {
> TCA_ACT_UNSPEC,
>@@ -12,6 +22,7 @@ enum {
> TCA_ACT_INDEX,
> TCA_ACT_STATS,
> TCA_ACT_PAD,
>+ TCA_ACT_COOKIE,
> __TCA_ACT_MAX
> };
>
>diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
>index f04715a..b82908a 100644
>--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
>@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static void free_tcf(struct rcu_head *head)
>
> free_percpu(p->cpu_bstats);
> free_percpu(p->cpu_qstats);
>+ kfree(p->act_ck);
> kfree(p);
> }
>
>@@ -464,8 +465,8 @@ int tcf_action_destroy(struct list_head *actions, int bind)
> return a->ops->dump(skb, a, bind, ref);
> }
>
>-int
>-tcf_action_dump_1(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, int bind, int ref)
>+int tcf_action_dump_1(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, int bind,
>+ int ref)
> {
> int err = -EINVAL;
> unsigned char *b = skb_tail_pointer(skb);
>@@ -475,6 +476,12 @@ int tcf_action_destroy(struct list_head *actions, int
>bind)
> goto nla_put_failure;
> if (tcf_action_copy_stats(skb, a, 0))
> goto nla_put_failure;
>+ if (a->act_ck) {
>+ if (nla_put(skb, TCA_ACT_COOKIE, a->act_ck->ck_len,
>+ a->act_ck))
>+ goto nla_put_failure;
>+ }
>+
> nest = nla_nest_start(skb, TCA_OPTIONS);
> if (nest == NULL)
> goto nla_put_failure;
>@@ -575,6 +582,23 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net,
>struct nlattr *nla,
> if (err < 0)
> goto err_mod;
>
>+ if (tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE]) {
>+ if (nla_len(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE]) > MAX_TC_COOKIE_SZ) {
>+ err = -EINVAL;
>+ goto err_mod;
>+ }
>+
>+ a->act_ck = kzalloc(sizeof(*a->act_ck), GFP_KERNEL);
>+ if (unlikely(!a->act_ck)) {
>+ err = -ENOMEM;
>+ goto err_mod;
>+ }
>+
>+ memcpy((void *)a->act_ck->ck, nla_data(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE]),
Unneeded (void *) cast.
>+ nla_len(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE]));
>+ a->act_ck->ck_len = nla_len(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE]);
>+ }
>+
> /* module count goes up only when brand new policy is created
> * if it exists and is only bound to in a_o->init() then
> * ACT_P_CREATED is not returned (a zero is).
>--
>1.9.1
>
