> index cd91070b5467..d326fc4afad7 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
> @@ -81,17 +81,23 @@ static void dsa_dst_del_ds(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
>
> static bool dsa_port_is_valid(struct dsa_port *port)
> {
> - return !!port->dn;
> + return !!(port->dn || port->name);
> }
Does this clash with Viviens recent change to make names optional and
have the kernel assign it?
I suppose you could use an name of "eth%d"? Is it worth adding a
comment to the platform data structure?
Andrew
