On 01/09/2017 12:28 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:13:19PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 01/09/2017 12:11 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:45:02AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> Add switchdev_port_bridge_getlink_deferred() which does a deferred
>>>> object dump operation, this is required for e.g: DSA switches which
>>>> typically have sleeping I/O operations which is incompatible with being
>>>> in atomic context obviously.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>
>>>> struct switchdev_attr attr = {
>>>> .orig_dev = dev,
>>>> @@ -829,12 +841,49 @@ int switchdev_port_bridge_getlink(struct sk_buff
>>>> *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq,
>>>> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>>>> return err;
>>>>
>>>> - return ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink(skb, pid, seq, dev, mode,
>>>> + return ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink(skb, pid, seq, d, mode,
>>>
>>> Was this s/dev/d/ by mistake?
>>
>> No, it's not a mistake, it was made so that the function signature could
>> be within 80 columns.
>
> Right, but the change on the signature is on the chunk prior to this
> one. Yet this one is not on the prototype and leads to:
>
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c: In function
> ‘__switchdev_port_bridge_getlink’:
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c:844:48: error: ‘d’ undeclared (first use
> in this function)
> return ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink(skb, pid, seq, d, mode,
> ^
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c:844:48: note: each undeclared identifier
> is reported only once for each function it appears in
> .../linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c:847:1: warning: control reaches end of
> non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
That's embarrassing, looks like I changed it after the fact to please
checkpatch.pl, that's a mistake. Thanks!
--
Florian
