On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:53 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> > Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 07:43:25 -0500 > >> These all look reasonably good, but it seems before we accept them, >> there should be an additional patch that actually makes use of the code. >> I presume that is forthcomming? > > This all comes from my asking that the original huge set of patches be > split up. > > People always just rush this kind of work and never think about laying > out the resubmission properly. > > One should always only submit new interfaces along with an actual use > because only with a use can we properly review whether the new > interface is good or not.
I was trying to keep the same order with rfc, but it seems not a good idea, will resplit, thanks.
