Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:00:19PM CET, and...@lunn.ch wrote: >> > No. That should be unique within one switch. In mlxsw we name it "p1", >> > "p2", ... >> > >> > The final netdev names are: >> > enp3s0np1, enp3s0np2, ... >> > >mlxsw are pci devices, so it follows this convention, i think: > > * [P<domain>]p<bus>s<slot>[f<function>][n<phys_port_name>|d<dev_port>] > * PCI geographical location > >Our devices are not on PCI. So they won't follow this. I've no idea >what they actually follow, since some are MDIO devices, some are SPI >devices, some are memory mapped.
Got it. We just have to make sure udev names them appropriately. > >I'm not against making the label option, but i do want to better >understand what we get as a result, just to make sure it is sensible. > >Vivien, could you try a recent udev and see what happens? > > Thanks > Andrew
