> Agreed, and this was my initial approach, but I also wanted a minimal
> fix for David to pull into "net" while we can properly resolve this for
> "net-next" see below.
O.K, so in that case, this is fine.
> Making the ops const was my initial approach but there are several
> challenges to making it possible right now which I will address against
> net-next:
>
> - register/unregister_switch_driver actually do modify dsa_switch_ops
> while updating the list pointer, so we need to encapsulate
> dsa_switch_ops into a dsa_switch_driver plus a list member
O.K, this is dsa v1. I had v2 in mind. Yes, the list needs
abstracting.
Thanks
Andrew
