On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:25:54 -0700 (PDT), Alex Davis wrote: > Here is dmesg output for module loading. > [...] > Jun 16 20:04:06 siafu kernel: [4294720.505000] bcm43xx_d80211: Virtual > interface added (type: > 0x00000002, ID: 4, MAC: 00:90:96:ba:32:20) > Jun 16 20:04:06 siafu kernel: [4294720.511000] bcm43xx_d80211: PHY connected > Jun 16 20:04:07 siafu kernel: [4294720.779000] bcm43xx_d80211: Radio turned on > Jun 16 20:04:07 siafu kernel: [4294720.971000] bcm43xx_d80211: Chip > initialized > Jun 16 20:04:07 siafu kernel: [4294720.972000] bcm43xx_d80211: DMA initialized > Jun 16 20:04:07 siafu kernel: [4294720.972000] bcm43xx_d80211: 80211 cores > initialized > Jun 16 20:04:07 siafu kernel: [4294720.972000] bcm43xx_d80211: Keys cleared > Jun 16 20:04:07 siafu kernel: [4294720.988000] wmaster0: Does not support > passive scan, disabled > Jun 16 20:04:09 siafu kernel: [4294723.027000] bcm43xx_d80211: ASSERTION > FAILED > (bcm->interface.if_id == if_id) at: > drivers/net/wireless/d80211/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c:4344:bcm43xx_config_interface()
This is really strange. Is this reproducible with latest wireless-dev? There was ifconfig up (or similar) command at 20:04:06 but wpa_supplicant was started at 20:04:14. What happened in-between? Most important, what happened between 20:04:07 and 20:04:09? (I.e. what commands were invoked?) Thanks, Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
