On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 11:11:31AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com> > Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:06:09 +0200 > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:07:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Eli Cohen <e...@dev.mellanox.co.il> > >> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:03:18 -0600 > >> > >> > If necessary I can make sure it builds on 32 bits as well. > >> > >> Please do. > > > > Dave, > > > > I'm failing to understand the benefits of building mlx5 on 32 bits, and > > see only disadvantages: > > * It is actual dead code without test coverage. > > * It misleads reviewers/customers by seeing code for 32 bits. > > * It adds compilation time for 32 bits platforms and "punishes" them > > for not relevant for them driver. > > > > Why do you call removing all that as a "regression"? > > We have this thing called "CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST", it has tons of value, > perhaps you've seen it before?
Thanks David, I see your point. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
