From: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 19:56:24 +0100
> +static inline u64 ether_addr_to_u64(const u8 *addr)
> +{
> + u64 u = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
> + u = u << 8 | addr[i];
> +
> + return u;
> +}
...
> +static inline void u64_to_ether_addr(u64 u, u8 *addr)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = ETH_ALEN - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + addr[i] = u & 0xff;
> + u = u >> 8;
> + }
> +}
I think these two routines behave differently on big vs little
endian. And I doubt this was your intention.
