On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:32 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 21:26:47 +0800 > >> As only when the result is not performed, initial_tsn variables is >> uninitialized, peer side would ignore this value, so here is also >> safe. > > It doesn't matter if it is "safe" or not, you must fix all of the > warnings reported by kbuild before your patches will be considered > for applying. will fix it in next post. thanks
- [PATCH net-next 21/27] sctp: a... Xin Long
- [PATCH net-next 22/27] sctp: a... Xin Long
- [PATCH net-next 23/27] sctp: a... Xin Long
- [PATCH net-next 24/27] sctp: a... Xin Long
- [PATCH net-next 25/27] sctp: a... Xin Long
- [PATCH net-next 26/27] sctp: a... Xin Long
- [PATCH net-next 27/27] sctp: a... Xin Long
- Re: [PATCH net-next 22/27] sct... kbuild test robot
- Re: [PATCH net-next 22/27] sct... Xin Long
- Re: [PATCH net-next 22/27] sct... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net-next 22/27] sct... Xin Long
- Re: [PATCH net-next 20/27] sct... kbuild test robot
- Re: [PATCH net-next 20/27] sct... Xin Long
- Re: [PATCH net-next 00/27] sctp: implement rfc6525 sctp ... Xin Long
- Re: [PATCH net-next 00/27] sctp: implement rfc6525 sctp ... David Miller