Responses inline Thanks, Satha
-----Original Message----- From: Sunil Kovvuri [mailto:sunil.kovv...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 5:05 AM To: Koteshwar Rao, Satha Cc: LKML; Goutham, Sunil; Robert Richter; David S. Miller; Daney, David; Vatsavayi, Raghu; Chickles, Derek; Romanov, Philip; Linux Netdev List; LAKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] PF driver modified to enable HW filter support, changes works in backward compatibility mode Enable required things in Makefile Enable LZ4 dependecy inside config file > > #define NIC_MAX_RSS_HASH_BITS 8 > #define NIC_MAX_RSS_IDR_TBL_SIZE (1 << NIC_MAX_RSS_HASH_BITS) > +#define NIC_TNS_RSS_IDR_TBL_SIZE 5 So you want to use only 5 queues per VF when TNS is enabled, is it ?? There are 4096 RSS indices in total, for each VF you can use max 32. I guess you wanted to set no of hash bits to 5 instead of table size. SATHA>>> We enabled 8 queues for VF. Yes Macro name misleads it has to be hash bits, will change this in next version > #define RSS_HASH_KEY_SIZE 5 /* 320 bit key */ > > struct nicvf_rss_info { > @@ -255,74 +258,6 @@ struct nicvf_drv_stats { > struct u64_stats_sync syncp; > }; > > -struct nicvf { > - struct nicvf *pnicvf; > - struct net_device *netdev; > - struct pci_dev *pdev; > - void __iomem *reg_base; Didn't get why you moved this structure to the end of file. Looks like an unnecessary modification. SATHA>>> Previously we have some dependency, we look into this, and address in next verison > +static unsigned int num_vfs; > +module_param(num_vfs, uint, 0644); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_vfs, "Non zero positive value, specifies number > +of VF's per physical port"); So what if driver is built-in instead of module, I can't use TNS is it ? SATHA>>> Still you can enable this special features by passing boot argument "nicpf.num_vfs=X" > > +/* Set RBDR Backpressure (RBDR_BP) and CQ backpressure (CQ_BP) of > +vnic queues > + * to 129 each Why 129 ?? RBDR minimum size is 8K buffers, why you want to assert BP when still ~4K buffers are available. Isn't 4K a huge number to start asserting backpressure ? SATHA>>> As CQ count was 4K entries, I used same BP value for both, will address this in next version
