On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> wrote: > Chain exists of: > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(genl_mutex); > lock(nlk->cb_mutex); > lock(genl_mutex); > lock(rtnl_mutex); > > *** DEADLOCK ***
This one looks legitimate, because nlk->cb_mutex could be rtnl_mutex. Let me think about it.
