Hi Niklas,

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>

Thanks, works fine on r8a7791/koelsch!

Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>

> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static struct sh_eth_cpu_data r8a779x_data = {
>
>         .register_type  = SH_ETH_REG_FAST_RCAR,
>
> -       .ecsr_value     = ECSR_PSRTO | ECSR_LCHNG | ECSR_ICD,
> +       .ecsr_value     = ECSR_PSRTO | ECSR_LCHNG | ECSR_ICD | ECSR_MPD,

Interestingly, the ECSR_MPD bit is already set for several SoCs.

Hence adding ".magic = 1" to the entry for r8a7740 instantly gave me working
WoL support on r8a7740/armadillo. Cool!

> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.h
> @@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ struct sh_eth_cpu_data {
>         unsigned shift_rd0:1;   /* shift Rx descriptor word 0 right by 16 */
>         unsigned rmiimode:1;    /* EtherC has RMIIMODE register */
>         unsigned rtrate:1;      /* EtherC has RTRATE register */
> +       unsigned magic:1;       /* EtherC have PMDE in ECMR and MPDIP in 
> ECSIPR */

Instead of adding a new flag, perhaps you can just check for the ECSR_MPD flag
in ecsr_value?

> @@ -529,6 +530,9 @@ struct sh_eth_private {
>         unsigned no_ether_link:1;
>         unsigned ether_link_active_low:1;
>         unsigned is_opened:1;
> +
> +       bool wol_enabled;

"unsigned wol_enabled:1", to merge with the bitfield above?

> +       struct clk *clk;

It's a good practice to keep all pointers at the top of the struct, to avoid
gaps due to alignment restrictions, especially on 64-bit (I know that's not
the case here).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to