On 2016年12月06日 23:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Several vhost functions were missing __user annotations
on pointers, causing sparse warnings. Fix this up.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
---
  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 10 +++++-----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 7331ef3..ba7db68 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static int memory_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *d, struct 
vhost_umem *umem,
  static int translate_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, u64 addr, u32 len,
                          struct iovec iov[], int iov_size, int access);
-static int vhost_copy_to_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void *to,
+static int vhost_copy_to_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void __user *to,
                              const void *from, unsigned size)
  {
        int ret;
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ static int vhost_copy_to_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, 
void *to,
  }
static int vhost_copy_from_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void *to,
-                               void *from, unsigned size)
+                               void __user *from, unsigned size)
  {
        int ret;
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static int vhost_copy_from_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void *to,
  }
static void __user *__vhost_get_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
-                                    void *addr, unsigned size)
+                                    void __user *addr, unsigned size)
  {
        int ret;
@@ -934,8 +934,8 @@ static int umem_access_ok(u64 uaddr, u64 size, int access)
        return 0;
  }
-int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
-                           struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
+static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
+                                  struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)
  {
        int ret = 0;

Patch looks good but this looks like another static conversion not __user annotations.

Reply via email to