Hello Corentin patches look ok, I just wonder if you tested it in case of the stmmac is connected to a transceiver. Let me consider it a critical part of the driver to properly work.
Regards Peppe On 12/1/2016 4:19 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
This patch simply rename regValue to value, like it was named in other mdio functions. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montj...@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c index e3216e5..6796c28 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c @@ -83,14 +83,14 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phyaddr, int phyreg) unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data; int data; - u16 regValue = (((phyaddr << 11) & (0x0000F800)) | + u16 value = (((phyaddr << 11) & (0x0000F800)) | ((phyreg << 6) & (0x000007C0))); - regValue |= MII_BUSY | ((priv->clk_csr & 0xF) << 2); + value |= MII_BUSY | ((priv->clk_csr & 0xF) << 2); if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address)) return -EBUSY; - writel(regValue, priv->ioaddr + mii_address); + writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address); if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address)) return -EBUSY;