Hello Corentin

patches look ok, I just wonder if you tested it in case of
the stmmac is connected to a transceiver. Let me consider it
a critical part of the driver to properly work.

Regards
Peppe

On 12/1/2016 4:19 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
This patch simply rename regValue to value, like it was named in other
mdio functions.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montj...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
index e3216e5..6796c28 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
@@ -83,14 +83,14 @@ static int stmmac_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int 
phyaddr, int phyreg)
        unsigned int mii_data = priv->hw->mii.data;

        int data;
-       u16 regValue = (((phyaddr << 11) & (0x0000F800)) |
+       u16 value = (((phyaddr << 11) & (0x0000F800)) |
                        ((phyreg << 6) & (0x000007C0)));
-       regValue |= MII_BUSY | ((priv->clk_csr & 0xF) << 2);
+       value |= MII_BUSY | ((priv->clk_csr & 0xF) << 2);

        if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
                return -EBUSY;

-       writel(regValue, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);
+       writel(value, priv->ioaddr + mii_address);

        if (stmmac_mdio_busy_wait(priv->ioaddr, mii_address))
                return -EBUSY;


Reply via email to