Daniel, On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary". If so, then by > definition there are none.
Well, being GPL compatible is not a requirement for an open source license. IANAL, but last I checked, pure-BSD is not compatible with GPL (it actually has to be dual-licensed BSD/GPL). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
