On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 12:50 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2016-11-24 14:27:13, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 22:44 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Thu 2016-11-24 12:05:25, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 12:05 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Remove duplicate code from _tx routines.
> > > >
> > > > trivia:
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > > >
> > > > []
> > > > > @@ -1960,6 +1960,38 @@ static void stmmac_tso_allocator(struct
> > > > > stmmac_priv *priv, unsigned int des,
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static void stmmac_xmit_common(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> > > > > net_device *dev, int nfrags, struct dma_desc *desc)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (unlikely(stmmac_tx_avail(priv) <= (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))) {
> > > > > + if (netif_msg_hw(priv))
> > > > > + pr_debug("%s: stop transmitted packets\n",
> > > > > __func__);
> > > >
> > > > netif_dbg(priv, hw, dev, "%s: stop transmitted
> > > > packets\n",
> > > > __func__);
> > >
> > > Not now. Modifying the code while de-duplicating would be bad idea.
> >
> > Too many people think overly granular patches are the
> > best and only way to make changes.
> > Deduplication and consolidation can happen simultaneously.
>
> Can, but should not at this point. Please take a look at the driver in
> question before commenting on trivial printk style.
I had.
It's perfectly acceptable and already uses netif_<level> properly.
This consolidation now introduces the _only_ instance where it is
now improperly using a netif_msg_<type> then single pr_<level>
function sequence that should be consolidated into netif_dbg.
Every other use of netif_msg_<level> then either emits multiple
lines or is used in an if/else.
cheers, Joe
