Yeah you got it. Great!!! On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Liyang Yu (于立洋1) <yuliya...@le.com> wrote: >> Please test my patch since you can reproduce it. > > Thanks cong, but Eric had said: "Really, this is not something that > can be solved by using 'a different initial sequence number'" > So I don't think it's nessary to test you patch, anyway thank you > very much.
That is correct, I missed the signed cast, it is similar to the jiffies test, for the overflow case, which means no matter which value we pick, we could drop packet as it is.
