On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:04:07AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:53:04PM -0800, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote: > > There are many example drivers in kernel which are using bus_register() in > > an initcall. > > There really are not, certainly not in major subsystems.
I see 2 drivers in the Block subsystem which do this: 19 5354 /nfs/site/home/iweiny/linux-stable/drivers/block/cciss.c <<cciss_init>> err = bus_register(&cciss_bus_type); 20 6447 /nfs/site/home/iweiny/linux-stable/drivers/block/rbd.c <<rbd_sysfs_init>> ret = bus_register(&rbd_bus_type); 2 drivers in the drm subsystem which do this: 29 1155 /nfs/site/home/iweiny/linux-stable/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c <<mipi_dsi_bus_init>> return bus_register(&mipi_dsi_bus_type); 30 242 /nfs/site/home/iweiny/linux-stable/drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c <<tegra_host1x_init>> err = bus_register(&host1x_bus_type); And I think there are a couple others. I'm not sure what these devices/buses do but they are registering their own bus while being in another major subsystem. Is what we are doing really so crazy/wrong? > > > We could add a custom Interface between HFI1 driver and hfi_vnic drivers > > without involving a bus. > > hfi is already registering on the infiniband class, just use that. > I don't understand what you mean here? The bus_register provides a really clean way for the hfi1 driver and hfi_vnic driver to find each other. This includes being able to support hfi1 with or without hfi_vnic being loaded. Note that without configuration from the "EM" Ethernet Manager the hfi_vnic does not export a net device. Why wouldn't we use this core kernel support?[*] > > But using the existing bus model gave a lot of in-built flexibility in > > decoupling devices from the drivers. > > If you want to have your own bus then you need your own hfi > subsystem. drivers/infiniband is not a dumping ground.. > We don't consider drivers/infiniband a "dumping ground". There is a requirement on ib_mad from the hfi_vnic driver. Ira [*] As an aside why does the ib_core not use this methodology? It dawned on me that this may be a better way to fix our module load problems. However, I have not looked into details. > Jason > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html