On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:32 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: David Lebrun <david.leb...@uclouvain.be>
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:14:04 +0100
>
>> This patch adds a new option CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL to enable/disable
>> support of encapsulation with the lightweight tunnels. When this option
>> is enabled, CONFIG_LWTUNNEL is automatically selected.
>>
>> Fix commit 6c8702c60b88 ("ipv6: sr: add support for SRH encapsulation and
>> injection with lwtunnels")
>>
>> Without a proper option to control lwtunnel support for SR-IPv6, if
>> CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=n then the IPv6 initialization fails as a consequence
>> of seg6_iptunnel_init() failure with EOPNOTSUPP:
>>
>> NET: Registered protocol family 10
>> IPv6: Attempt to unregister permanent protocol 6
>> IPv6: Attempt to unregister permanent protocol 136
>> IPv6: Attempt to unregister permanent protocol 17
>> NET: Unregistered protocol family 10
>>
>> Tested (compiling, booting, and loading ipv6 module when relevant)
>> with possible combinations of CONFIG_IPV6={y,m,n},
>> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL={y,n} and CONFIG_LWTUNNEL={y,n}.
>>
>> Reported-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com>
>> Suggested-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lebrun <david.leb...@uclouvain.be>
>
> Applied.
ipv6 seems to be still broken in the latest net-next
when CONFIG_LWTUNNEL is not set:
# ping 127.0.0.1
ping: socket: Address family not supported by protocol
# ping -4 127.0.0.1
PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.067 ms
it works with CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=y
Roopa, David, please take a look.
Thanks!
