Hi Sven, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sven Eckelmann <s...@narfation.org> wrote: > On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote: >> Hi Sven, >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann <s...@narfation.org> wrote: >> > On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET f...@ikuai8.com wrote: >> >> From: Gao Feng <f...@ikuai8.com> >> >> >> >> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but >> >> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan, >> > >> > s/packe/packet/ >> >> What's this mean? > > That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when > applied only to the commit message) would fix it.
Thanks. I didn't thought it was sed statement. > > David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would > guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And > maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not. > > Kind regards, > Sven I would correct the typo in the patch for net-next. Best Regards Feng
