On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 09:11 -0800, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Colin King <colin.k...@canonical.com >> > wrote: >> > >> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com> >> > >> > family->id is unsigned, so the less than zero check for >> > failure return from idr_alloc is never true and so the error exit >> > is never handled. Instead, assign err and check if this is less >> > than zero since this is a signed integer. >> >> Why family->id can't be just signed int? For me it should be. > > I suppose it could be, since family IDs are allocated in a 16-bit range > anyway. But family IDs can also never actually be negative, so having > an unsigned int in the struct makes sense too.
All idr_* API's accept int, rather than unsigned int. This is my point.
